It is kinda weird when you go to a restaurant and just ordered this Sizzling Taufu, so we decide to order 1 big plate of fried mee to share together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb6e/adb6edfc1b98d24736b2354a2cfc31ea09e4538c" alt=""
2.视野角度:由于发光原理不同,等离子和液晶电视虽然可视角都可以达到170度,但是液晶电视在大偏角观看时,画面会有偏色现象,而等离子则无此问题。因此在全家一起观看或客厅面积较大时,等离子电视更为适合。
3.动态清晰度/响应速度:动态清晰度是指人眼观看运动画面时所感受到的视觉清晰度。响应速度是电视机电路对运动画面处理的反应时间。等离子具有优异的动 态清晰度和极快的响应速度(小于1ms),无论是静止的风景画面还是快速的体育画面,都能清晰地表现出来,没有拖尾现象。液晶的响应速度在8—25ms之 间,在播放低速移动的画面时,画质比等离子细腻,然而动态画面表现则远不如等离子,在播放快速移动画面时,容易产生拖尾现象、图像重叠,由此引起视觉疲劳 感,进而影响视力健康。
4.消耗电力:从产品数据来看,42英寸的等离子的功率一般在350W左右, 高于同尺寸液晶的一般功率。但由于发光原理不同,等离子和液晶在不同画面上的消耗功率也不同。等离子是屏幕像素自发光,随着画面的明暗变化耗电量也在变 化,350W是指它在峰值亮度时的功率。液晶不管画面如何变化,其背光始终发光,因此耗电量是固定的。如播放画面较亮的综艺节目时,等离子的功耗较大;而 普通亮度画面(新闻、体育赛事、电视剧等)下,等离子与液晶差不多;在画面比较暗,如播放电影时,等离子的功耗要低于液晶。
5.使用寿命:目前等离子和液晶电视都能达到60000小时的显示寿命(显示能力衰减50%),但实际上在16000小时时,等离子屏幕显示能力将衰减10%,而液晶则因需要采用背光源其衰减将高达40%。
笔者观点:在对比度、动态清晰度、响应速度等方面,液晶的表现均不如等离子,尤其在大画面时画质差异尤为明显。此外,由于制造工艺不同,随着屏幕尺寸的增大,液晶的制造成本也不断上升,而等离子的制造成本却会降低。因此,如购买40英寸以上的大屏幕平板电视,等离子将是最佳的选择。
Many motorists have not purchased cheaper RON92 even though their car engine may be able to use it either through ignorance, lack of understanding and even being discouraged by pump attendants who often call this grade of fuel 'Lama' (old). However, there are also valid reasons why some motorists have avoided RON92 even though it can be used for their car. This concerns the additives in RON92 petrol which vary from company to company. The additives are a vital part of the formulation and help to keep the inside of the engine (especially the fuel delivery system) clean so it runs efficiently. It is these additives, upgraded from time to time, which are often the subject of advertising claims of 'cleaner running', 'better fuel economy', etc.
The thing is that because it was perceived in earlier years that RON92 was used by 'low-tech' engine like marine engines, lawnmowers and motorcycles, the petroleum companies felt that it was unnecessary to spend extra money on additives and according to a source in one company, there is almost no additive in that company's RON92 petrol.Companies like Chevron Malaysia do, however, provide an identical additive package (which the company calls 'Techron') for both grades of their Caltex fuel. As such, the superior benefits which are advertised are not limited only to the RON97 grade. The other company known to also adopt the same approach was ProJet, which is no longer in business here.
Statistically, it may be that the limited number of pumps offering RON92 has led decision-makers to conclude that this grade is 'not in great demand' when in fact, carmakers have been heading in the direction of lower RON for many years now.
The proposed new grade of RON95 is, nevertheless, a good compromise and should be fine for the majority of cars on Malaysian roads. This grade has been a popular one with Japanese manufacturers, possibly because in Japan, their Regular grade has been RON95 for a long time.
The other part of the proposal is to introduce a higher grade of RON99 in place of RON97, which does not make much sense. It will cost more to produce for one thing and less than 1% of all vehicles here would require such a high octane. Even high-performance engines like the Volkswagen/Audi/Skoda FSI engine, the 1.6-litre engine of the Suzuki Swift Sport and the 1.8-litre engine of the old Ford TX3 need only RON98 at most to run at optimum.
However, the interesting thing is that the government will provide a smaller subsidy for RON99 petrol because it is assumed that those who own cars which require such fuel can afford to pay more for their fuel. A larger proportion of the billions of RM in subsidies will be allocated for RON95 to keep its price down since a larger proportion of the rakyat will use it.
"The goal is to have subsidies targeted and more focused at those who need it, such as the lower income and middle income groups, and giving a choice to the rich on what petrol they want to fill in their tank," said Datuk Shahrir Samad, the minister.
High-performance models like the Civic Type-R, Swift Sport and Lancer Evo need high octane fuel (RON98) but such cars are sold in very small numbers in Malaysia |
Recently there is a debate on pharmacist dispensing right at New Straits Times:
Dispensing medicine: Let's conduct in-depth study firstThose doctor who object pharmacist dispensing right are just afraid of losing their means of getting extra income from dispensing drugs. Sounds familiar ? It is just like those UMNO conies who are afraid of losing their contracts when people say want to start open tender system. They will give various excuses like no 24 hours pharmacy, troublesome etc… which is just plain nonsense, but I do agree that some people living in rural area will have difficulty in getting medication, thus I would say it is ok for those doctor serving in rural area to dispense, but not those in urban city!
Things like drugs can be get at a cheaper price in a clinic was due to the fact that doctors do get a better deal/discount on some drugs compared with pharmacist, reasons? Ask those pharmaceutical company. Moreover, a doctor can get earn through consultation fee, but there is no consultation fee for seeing a pharmacist, therefore pharmacist will need to earn through other way.
Doctor do study Pharmacology, but how much do they learn compared with a Pharmacist ? I know how to drive a car and M.Schumacher also know, but the difference is the driving skill he has got is more than me…that is the main point, both Dr and RPh have different specialized skills and they work together for the benefit of patients!
To all Malaysian, medication error can be very minor, but it can also be life-threatening. Pharmacist is your another barrier for preventing this from happening, pharmacist with dispensing right will be a win-win situation for all of us.